|
U.S.A.
/ 2004
Directed by Tony Marsiglia
Starring
Misty Mundae
Darian Caine
Julian Wells
Color / 88 Minutes / Not Rated
Format: DVD (R1 - NTSC)
E.I./Seduction Cinema
|
 |
|
|
|
Hold
your mouse pointer over an image for a
pop-up caption
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
 |
|
9 |
|
10
= Highest Rating |
|
|
Direct-to-video
sex starlet Misty Mundae gets a chance to spread
her acting wings in writer/director Tony Marsiglia's
avant-garde follow-up to Dr.
Jekyll & Mistress Hyde.
I'll try not to flog a dead
horse here, but (as covered in past reviews) I'm
personally not very keen on surrealistic cinema.
And Lust For Dracula
happens to be very surreal. After watching
it twice I still don't understand a great deal
of what I saw. In the DVD's audio commentary Marsiglia
states that the film's main theme is that people
and situations are often not what we see and think
them to be. The same could be said for this movie.
The Dracula legend, as handed down by Bram Stoker
and interpreted in countless films ever since,
is turned almost completely on its head. I was
left puzzled to be sure — downright baffled in
fact — but at least not frustrated (...if you
know what I mean).
Mina
Harker (Mundae) is one messed up chick. For one
thing, she's insane. For another, she's constantly
being plied with psychotropic drugs by her cold
and inattentive husband, the director of a pharmaceutical
company. Hubby Jonathan (Julian Wells) is actually
a woman — only Mina
doesn't realize this. If she did she'd probably
understand why she's unable to get pregnant. To
compensate she's created a fantasy child, a straw
doll she keeps in a cradle upstairs. (Which begs
the question... Is Mina crazy because she's taking
the pills or taking the pills because she's crazy?)
In the midst of this weird situation Dracula (Darian
Caine) appears at the Harker home one night. Just
Dracula —
not 'Countess' Dracula, even though the vampire
is a female. (And a stark naked one at that!)
Rather than some bloodthirsty monster this Dracula
is a kind soul, offering the confused and lonely
Mina a sympathetic shoulder, even love. (Mundae
and Caine share a genuinely erotic —
even tender — lovemaking
scene that's very nicely photographed, accompanied
by spare yet evocative ambient music composed
by Don Mike.) Mina's chance for happiness may
be short-lived, however; her older sister Abigail
(Shelly Jones) is aware of Dracula's unearthly
nature and wants to destroy him —
uh, I mean her. Abigail also seems to covet
Mina's husband, whom she's fooled around with
in the past. (Does Abigail realize Jonathan is
really a woman? She's taking the same pills as
her sister...) While all this is going on, a vampire
named Sarah (Andrea Davis) is initiating a young
novice (Casey Jones) in the ways of the Lesbian
Undead. Abigail knows of them, or at least she
sees (and has sex with) them in bizarre dreams.
Are they servants of Dracula? Or some other dark
mas— er, mistress?
Trippy
scenario aside, Lust For
Dracula is, when all is said and done,
a softcore lesbian sex film —
one made by men. Over half the running time is
consumed by Sapphic encounters. Most of the cast
members go naked throughout. (Darian Caine, in
fact, doesn't wear a stitch of clothes except
in a single brief scene.) One's mileage will naturally
vary depending on your attraction to certain types
of women. Caine, Andrea Davis and Casey Jones
sport tattoos and/or multiple piercings; Shelly
Jones displays some pretty obvious breast implants.
The barely legal-looking Casey has a distinct
aura of 'trailer park jailbait' about her but,
to be fair, this seems to be the nature of her
character. None of the ladies I just mentioned
are particularly adept at acting. This was the
first film for the Joneses (real-life sisters)
and it shows. Davis, it should be noted, has improved
immensely since her performance in Dr.
Jekyll & Mistress Hyde —
she's very uninhibited in front of the
camera, and with further acting experience could
develop into a formidable player in the erotica/sexploitation
genre. As for Julian Wells, the athletic blonde
wears little makeup and dresses in men's clothing
(when she isn't nude) for her gender-bending turn
as Mina's "husband". She seems to relish playing
this unusual character, getting into the role
via physical mannerisms and terse line delivery.
Wells is very good, particularly in the difficult
scenes depicting Jonathan's abusive treatment
of Mina.
Then
there's Misty Mundae. She may not be drop-dead
model gorgeous but the realness she projects onscreen
(and I'm not just referring to the absence of
surgical enhancement) makes her just as sexy,
if not more so, than the perfectly toned-and-coiffed
plastic goddesses our culture's so enamored with
right now. She's the type of gal one could imagine
actually encountering in the real world —
in a grocery store, an ATM
queue or a coffee
shop — and be instantly
(and intensely) attracted to. As Lust
For Dracula's Mina, she's given the difficult
task of portraying a troubled young woman who's
both endearingly vulnerable and stark raving
mad. The apex of this fine balancing act comes
as Mina 'reads' the story of "Little Bat-Bat"
to her imaginary child. (The autobiographical
tale obviously springs from her deranged, drug-addled
mind.)
Besides
Misty's performance, the most laudatory aspect
of Lust For Dracula
is just how amazing the film looks considering
the tight schedule and meager budget —
it was shot in a mere five days for approximately
$60,000. This isn't some "Hey, kids! Let's
make a movie!"-style indie project where the
participants (especially behind the camera) possess
a lot more enthusiasm than actual talent. The
film is quite stylish in its compositions and
editing, making deft use of color and sound.
That it was shot on film
stock, not digital video, makes a world of difference.
Marsiglia and DP Dang Lenawae (who worked together
on Mistress Hyde)
are capable of producing high quality visuals
with little to work with and even less time for
set-up and multiple takes.
So
while I knocked off a few ratings points for the
perplexing narrative, I can nonetheless see how
others might have a higher opinion. Anyone who
enjoys the modern avant-garde 'horrotica' of Jess
Franco — I'm referring
to his work over
the past 10 to 15 years —
should find something to like here. (This film
is a helluva lot better than Franco's Lust
For Frankenstein, that's for sure!) And for
fans of Misty Mundae, this
is definitely Must-See DTV.
|
|
|
|
Seduction Cinema has issued
two versions of Lust For
Dracula: an R-rated edition (acceptable
to retail chains like Best Buy) and the unedited
"Director's Cut" reviewed here. The film is presented
in anamorphic widescreen (1.85:1) format with
a solid Dolby 2.0 audio mix. There's a bit of
grain noticeable at times but overall, given the
low budget nature of the production, the movie
looks and sounds absolutely first-rate.
Although
the DVD doesn't come with a bonus soundtrack CD
a la Dr. Jekyll &
Mistress Hyde, it's almost as packed with
extras. First up
is a 6 minute behind-the-scenes featurette which
shows the cast and crew at work, mostly at the
rented house subbing for the Harker domicile,
and during downtime between takes (with the ladies
smoking and joking a lot). Also running some 6
minutes, a solo interview with Misty Mundae reveals
that, while she didn't fully understand the script
(I feel much better now!), she appreciated the
opportunity to play a meatier character than usual
and enjoyed working with Marsiglia again. The
director himself is joined by producer Michael
Raso for a full-length commentary track, which
sticks mainly to the nuts and bolts of microbudget
independent filmmaking; Raso freely admits that
he, too, doesn't quite fathom Lust
For Dracula's odd story and surreal structure.
(Admirably, the two gents consciously avoid any
sophomoric banter of the wink-wink-nudge-nudge
variety... even in the midst of up close and personal
beaver diddling scenes. Marsiglia also states
that he can't bear to watch the edited, R-rated
cuts of his films.) Not related to Lust
For Dracula is a 14-minute experimental
short entitled InSex, about a lonely guy
enthralled by a seductress who's actually more
insect than human.
Topping off the package
are a whopping 25 trailers for Seduction Cinema
DVDs. These include skin-filled promos for many
of the company's best-selling titles (Misty is
prominently featured, natch) as well as Coming
Attractions for such future releases as Chantal,
The Erotic Diary Of Misty
Mundae and the Joseph Sarno flicks comprising
the Girl Meets Girl Collection.
5/12/05
|
•
Home
| Reviews | Top
•
|